Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2016-10-20 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Gray and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.54 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel has an overall score of 80.2, which is slightly better than Motorola DROID Turbo's 77.9 global score. The Google Pixel construction is newer, incredibly thinner and lighter than the Motorola DROID Turbo. Motorola DROID Turbo has a better screen than Google Pixel, because it has a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution, a better number of pixels per inch of display and a little bit bigger screen.
Motorola DROID Turbo has a little faster processing unit than Google Pixel, because although it has 1 GB less RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. The Google Pixel counts with a superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 64 GB more internal storage.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a bit better camera than Google Pixel, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same camera aperture, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a way more mega pixels back camera. The Motorola DROID Turbo has a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity against 2770mAh.
Although Google Pixel is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola DROID Turbo. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Google Pixel, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola DROID Turbo, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.