Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL is slightly better than Motorola DROID Turbo, getting an 82.5 score against 77.9. Google Pixel 2 XL is a noticeably newer phone, and it's also thinner and just a bit lighter than Motorola DROID Turbo. Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and less cores , it also counts with an additional GPU.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a brighter screen than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher count of pixels in each inch of screen. The Motorola DROID Turbo takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photography and videos and lower 24 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a camera with a lot higher 20.7 megapixels resolution.
The Google Pixel 2 XL has much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola DROID Turbo has just a bit longer battery life than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 3900mAh battery size.
Google Pixel 2 XL costs a little more than the Motorola DROID Turbo, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.