Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is slightly better than Motorola DROID Turbo, having an 80 score against 77.9. The Google Pixel 3 construction is notably newer, thinner and somewhat lighter than the Motorola DROID Turbo. The Motorola DROID Turbo has a little bit better processing power than Google Pixel 3, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM memory and lesser processing cores , it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a more vivid display than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px and more pixels per inch of screen. Google Pixel 3 features as much memory to install applications and games as the Motorola DROID Turbo one, they have equal 64 GB internal storage.
Motorola DROID Turbo has improved battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 3900mAh battery capacity against 2915mAh. The Motorola DROID Turbo has just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for shooting photos and video in low light situations and slower 24 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Google Pixel 3 is more expensive than the Motorola DROID Turbo, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.