Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL has an overall score of 80.7, which is a bit better than the Motorola DROID Turbo's score of 77.9. Although Google Pixel 3 XL is just a little heavier than Motorola DROID Turbo, it's noticeably thinner and also extremely newer. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a bit better processor than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has lesser CPU cores and 1 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with an additional GPU.
Motorola DROID Turbo has a better screen than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a little smaller display and a bit lower 2560 x 1440 resolution, it also counts with a little bit greater pixels density. The Motorola DROID Turbo and the Google Pixel 3 XL both have incredibly similar memory to store more games and applications, both of them have equal internal memory capacity.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a tinier aperture and slower 24 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a camera with a lot better 20.7 MP resolution.
Motorola DROID Turbo has a little longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 3 XL is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the Motorola DROID Turbo, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.