Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is just a bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo, having an 81.9 score against 77.9. The Google Pixel 4 is a way newer phone, and it's also incredibly thinner and a little bit lighter than Motorola DROID Turbo. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit better performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores (and also faster).
Motorola DROID Turbo has a sharper display than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a better amount of pixels per inch in the screen. Motorola DROID Turbo shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for capturing photographs and video in low-light situations and slower 24 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a way more megapixels camera in the back.
The Google Pixel 4 counts with as much memory for apps and games as the Motorola DROID Turbo, both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola DROID Turbo has a very superior battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Although Google Pixel 4 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola DROID Turbo. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Google Pixel 4, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola DROID Turbo, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.