Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL is slightly better than the Motorola DROID Turbo, with an 82.9 score against 77.9. Google Pixel 4 XL's body is way newer and way thinner, but also just a little heavier than Motorola DROID Turbo. The Motorola DROID Turbo features a brighter screen than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a little worse resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of display.
Google Pixel 4 XL's storage to install games and applications is very similar to the Motorola DROID Turbo one, both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage. The Google Pixel 4 XL has a bit better processor than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with 4 more CPU cores and 3 GB more RAM.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola DROID Turbo captures a little bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has slower 24 frames per second video frame rates and a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a camera with much more mega pixels.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola DROID Turbo. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Google Pixel 4 XL, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola DROID Turbo, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.