Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-08-20 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Just black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is a little bit better than the Motorola DROID Turbo, with a score of 82.9 against 77.9. Google Pixel 4a's design is a lot newer, thinner and somewhat lighter than the Motorola DROID Turbo. Both devices we are comparing use Android operating system, but Google Pixel 4a has the previous 11 version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version.
Motorola DROID Turbo has a sharper screen than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a greater pixel density. The Motorola DROID Turbo has a bit faster processor than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has 3 GB lesser RAM and an inferior number of cores (but faster), it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has worse 24 frames per second video frame rates and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light captures, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a lot higher 20.7 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
The Google Pixel 4a has a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with superior battery life than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 4a is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Google Pixel 4a, else you can save some money and get the Motorola DROID Turbo, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.