Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-11-19 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Clearly white and Just black |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has an overall score of 87.5, which is better than the Motorola DROID Turbo's overall score of 77.9. Google Pixel 4a 5G is a a lot newer cellphone, and it's also way thinner and a little lighter than the Motorola DROID Turbo. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has older 11 version and Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a bit better processor than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has 3 GB lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. The Motorola DROID Turbo has a better looking screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen pixels density and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440.
Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a very superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 4a 5G's battery lifetime is just as good as the Motorola DROID Turbo one, although the Google Pixel 4a 5G has a 0 percent smaller battery capacity.
Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a little bit better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a back camera with a way worse 12.2 mega-pixels resolution and a lower video quality, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos.
Although Google Pixel 4a 5G is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Google Pixel 4a 5G, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola DROID Turbo, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.