Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-10-15 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Just black and Sorta sage |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has a global score of 89, which is better than the Motorola DROID Turbo's 77.9 global score. The Google Pixel 5 is a noticeably newer cellphone, and it's also incredibly thinner and somewhat lighter than Motorola DROID Turbo. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a brighter display than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better count of pixels per screen inch and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution.
Google Pixel 5 features a much better storage for applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola DROID Turbo has a bit faster processor than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and 4 lesser cores (although they are faster), it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor.
Google Pixel 5 features just a bit better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a lot worse 12.2 mega-pixels resolution camera and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better captures and videos in low-light situations. The Google Pixel 5 has a little longer battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 4080mAh battery size.
Although Google Pixel 5 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo. If you want to save some money, you can buy Motorola DROID Turbo, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.