Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2017-02-21 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black and Blue | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 565 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.54 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo is a bit better than the HTC U Ultra, having a 77.9 score against 77. Despite being the best phone we are comparing, it must be noted that it's also much older, extremely thicker and just a little heavier. The Motorola DROID Turbo has a brighter screen than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a little bit higher display pixels density.
The HTC U Ultra counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the HTC U Ultra also has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a bit better processing unit than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with an extra graphics processor.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with longer battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 3900mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. HTC U Ultra's camera is very similar to Motorola DROID Turbo's camera, because although the HTC U Ultra has a camera in the back with a much worse 12 mega pixels resolution and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better low light photography and videos.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Motorola DROID Turbo is also a lot cheaper, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.