Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2014-10-28 | 2018-11-09 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black and Gray |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.54 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo is a little bit better than the LG G7 Fit, with a global score of 77.9 against 77. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola DROID Turbo has older 4.4.4 version and LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version. Although it's the best phone in our current comparison, it must be told that it is also a much older, heavier and extremely thicker phone.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a bit better processor than LG G7 Fit, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with an additional graphics processing unit. LG G7 Fit features a display that is just as good as Motorola DROID Turbo's screen, because although the LG G7 Fit has a little bit less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a quite better 1440 x 3120px resolution and a larger display.
Motorola DROID Turbo features a bit better camera than LG G7 Fit, because although it has worse 24 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a larger camera aperture for better low-light photography and video and a camera in the back with much more MP.
LG G7 Fit counts with a much greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with superior battery life than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 3900mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.