Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-10-28 | 2019-11-01 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ has a score of 82.7, which is just a bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo's global score of 77.9. These devices use Android operating system, but the LG G8X ThinQ has older 10 version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version. Even though LG G8X ThinQ is a little bit heavier than the Motorola DROID Turbo, it's extremely thinner and much newer.
LG G8X ThinQ features a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with 4 more cores and a greater amount of RAM. The Motorola DROID Turbo features a much better looking display than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a better 2560 x 1440px resolution.
LG G8X ThinQ counts with a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has more internal memory and a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG G8X ThinQ features a slightly better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a camera with much less MP resolution and a lower (4K) video definition, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to capture better low light images and videos.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a little longer battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Although LG G8X ThinQ is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola DROID Turbo. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy the Motorola DROID Turbo, letting go a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.