Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2014-10-28 | 2018-03-09 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and Blue | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ has a global score of 82.5, which is a bit better than the Motorola DROID Turbo's 77.9 overall score. Both of these devices have Android OS, but LG V30S ThinQ has the newer 8.0 Oreo version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version, providing some nice extra features and performance optimizations. The LG V30S ThinQ is a way newer device, and it is also way thinner and lighter than the Motorola DROID Turbo.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a much better looking screen than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a little worse resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display. Motorola DROID Turbo features a little bit better performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with an extra graphics processor.
LG V30S ThinQ features a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with better battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity.
LG V30S ThinQ features a camera that is very similar to Motorola DROID Turbo's camera, because although the LG V30S ThinQ has a way worse resolution camera in the back and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a larger aperture.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola DROID Turbo. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Motorola DROID Turbo, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.