Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than the Motorola DROID Turbo's overall score of 77.9. The LG V35 ThinQ body is noticeably newer, somewhat lighter and extremely thinner than Motorola DROID Turbo. The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit superior processor than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with a higher number of faster cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a sharper display than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a bit worse 2560 x 1440px resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater pixel amount per inch in the display. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a way bigger memory for apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features greater battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has an 18 percent larger battery size. The LG V35 ThinQ captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a lot less mega pixels back facing camera and a lower (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better captures and video in poorly lited situations.
Although LG V35 ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola DROID Turbo. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the LG V35 ThinQ, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Motorola DROID Turbo, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.