Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 10 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ is a little bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo, having an 81.2 score against 77.9. Both of these devices have Android OS, but LG V40 ThinQ has older 10 version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version. The LG V40 ThinQ construction is notably newer, a little lighter and notably thinner than Motorola DROID Turbo.
LG V40 ThinQ features just a bit better processing power than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory and a larger number of faster cores. The Motorola DROID Turbo features a much better screen than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little bit better pixels number per display inch.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video definition and a back camera with a lot lower resolution, it also counts with a way bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light captures and video. The LG V40 ThinQ features a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the LG V40 ThinQ also has an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Motorola DROID Turbo features greater battery duration than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has an 18% larger battery capacity.
Although LG V40 ThinQ is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola DROID Turbo. If you want to save some dollars, you can get the Motorola DROID Turbo, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.