Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-03-20 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ has an overall score of 87.6, which is much better than Motorola DROID Turbo's 77.9 overall score. Even though the LG V60 ThinQ is heavier than Motorola DROID Turbo, it's incredibly thinner and newer. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V60 ThinQ has an older 11 version and Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a sharper display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a slightly better resolution of 2560 x 1440. LG V60 ThinQ features a little faster CPU than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and a larger number of cores.
LG V60 ThinQ takes a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a bigger aperture, a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality. The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a much better memory for applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with improved battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3900mAh.
Although LG V60 ThinQ is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola DROID Turbo. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the Motorola DROID Turbo, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.