Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is much better than Motorola DROID Turbo, having a general score of 87.1 against 77.9. Although the LG Velvet is just a little heavier than Motorola DROID Turbo, it's extremely thinner and also newer. Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a better looking screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 2560 x 1440px and more pixels per screen inch.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a little better hardware performance than LG Velvet, because although it has lesser processing cores and 3 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a graphics processor. The LG Velvet features a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
LG Velvet features just a little bit longer battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 10% bigger battery capacity. LG Velvet captures better photographs and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the LG Velvet also has a camera in the back with a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution, higher 30 fps video frame rate and a bigger camera aperture.
Although LG Velvet is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the LG Velvet, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola DROID Turbo, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.