Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Microsoft |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2021-09-20 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Glacier and Obsidian |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 8.3 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2688 x 1892 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4449mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is just a bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo, getting a general score of 85.3 against 77.9. Microsoft Surface Duo 2's body is a lot newer and extremely thinner, but heavier than Motorola DROID Turbo. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has 11 version and Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features a sharper display than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a really smaller display, it also counts with a better amount of pixels per inch of display. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a bit faster processing unit than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with 5 GB more RAM memory and a higher number of faster cores.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 64 GB more internal storage. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a little better battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 14 percent bigger battery capacity.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a slightly better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a much lower 12 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a lower video quality, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better captures and video in low light situations.
Although Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola DROID Turbo. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Microsoft Surface Duo 2, else you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola DROID Turbo, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.