Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 10 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola edge has a general score of 89.6, which is better than Motorola DROID Turbo's 77.9 overall score. The Motorola edge design is noticeably newer and somewhat thinner than the Motorola DROID Turbo's, although it is also just a bit heavier. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but Motorola edge has 10 version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with an incredibly better looking display than Motorola edge, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a higher pixels amount in each inch of display. Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a bit better hardware performance than Motorola edge, because although it has less RAM memory and 4 less CPU cores (although they are faster), it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor.
Motorola edge has a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and 256 GB internal memory. The Motorola edge has a bit superior battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3900mAh.
The Motorola edge features a very superior camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola edge also has a larger camera aperture, a back-facing camera with much more MP and better video frame rates.
Although Motorola edge is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy Motorola DROID Turbo, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.