Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 14 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a score of 86.3, which is much better than the Motorola DROID Turbo's 77.9 global score. Motorola Edge 50 Pro's design is much newer and thinner, but just a little bit heavier than Motorola DROID Turbo. Both phones in this review work with Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has 14 version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version.
Motorola DROID Turbo features a little bit better looking display than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel number per inch of screen and a better 2560 x 1440px resolution. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a much greater memory for apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 512 GB internal storage.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores and 9 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with an extra GPU. Motorola Edge 50 Pro captures much clearer photographs and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has better 30 frames per second video frame rate, a back camera with lot more mega-pixels and a way bigger diafragm aperture to take better photography and videos in low light environments.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 15 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.