Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 14 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| -- | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is better than Motorola DROID Turbo, getting an 87.1 score against 77.9. Both devices in our current comparison include Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has 14 version and Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a much newer and extremely thinner cellphone than the Motorola DROID Turbo, although it's heavier.
Motorola DROID Turbo features a little more vivid screen than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440. The Motorola DROID Turbo features a way better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has 9 GB less RAM memory and lesser CPU cores (although they are faster), it also counts with an additional GPU.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with much more memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has more internal memory. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a bit longer battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 15% greater battery size. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a very superior camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has higher 60 fps video frame rates, a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light images and video and a way more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.