Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2017-08-10 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and Blue | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 135.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a general score of 77.9, which is slightly better than Moto Z2 Force Edition's 77.4 score. Although the Motorola DROID Turbo is better than Moto Z2 Force Edition, it must be told that it is also a much older, heavier and much thicker phone. The Motorola DROID Turbo has a much better display than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 2560 x 1440, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of screen.
Moto Z2 Force Edition has a much bigger storage to install games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola DROID Turbo features a bit faster CPU than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and 4 less cpu cores (although faster), it also counts with a graphics processor.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a superior battery life than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 43 percent larger battery size. The Motorola DROID Turbo shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same camera aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a back camera with a much better resolution.
Motorola DROID Turbo not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.