Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2017-06-29 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo is slightly better than Moto Z2 Play, having a score of 77.9 against 77.4. The Motorola DROID Turbo body is a lot older, thicker and heavier than Moto Z2 Play. Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a much better display than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a better screen density.
The Moto Z2 Play counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Moto Z2 Play also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has lesser cpu cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit.
Motorola DROID Turbo captures clearer photos and videos than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has lower 24 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video quality, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a back-facing camera with way more megapixels.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has better battery life than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 3900mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, Motorola DROID Turbo is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.