Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2014-10-28 | 2018-08-16 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black and Blue | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo is just a bit better than Moto Z3, with a overall score of 77.9 against 77.6. The Motorola DROID Turbo design is notably older, incredibly thicker and heavier than the Moto Z3. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but Motorola DROID Turbo has 4.4.4 version while Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Motorola DROID Turbo features a little bit better hardware performance than Moto Z3, because although it has an inferior number of cores and less RAM memory, it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. Motorola DROID Turbo has a sharper screen than Moto Z3, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a greater display pixel density.
Moto Z3 has a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Moto Z3 also has a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a little bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z3, because although it has worse 24 fps video frame rate, and they both have a same size aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a camera in the back with a lot better 20.7 megapixels resolution.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features better battery duration than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a 3900mAh battery size.
Motorola DROID Turbo not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.