Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2019-08-16 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 135.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Action is slightly better than the Motorola DROID Turbo, having a global score of 78.5 against 77.9. Motorola One Action is a thinner device than the Motorola DROID Turbo, but they weight the same. Motorola DROID Turbo features a bit better CPU than Motorola One Action, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM memory and a lower number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a more vivid screen than Motorola One Action, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a better screen pixel density. Motorola DROID Turbo features just a bit better camera than Motorola One Action, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light photos and video and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a camera with way more megapixels.
Motorola One Action has a much bigger storage to install applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a bit longer battery life than Motorola One Action, because it has a 3900mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Although Motorola One Action is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola DROID Turbo. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Motorola DROID Turbo, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.