Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2019-12-04 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 135.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Hyper is a bit better than the Motorola DROID Turbo, getting a 79.8 score against 77.9. Both phones we are comparing have Android operating system, but Motorola One Hyper has older 11 version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4. Motorola One Hyper is a incredibly newer and a lot thinner cellphone than Motorola DROID Turbo, although it is heavier.
Motorola DROID Turbo features a little faster processing unit than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has less CPU cores (although faster) and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a way better display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel number per inch in the display and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution.
The Motorola One Hyper captures much better photographs and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola One Hyper also has a larger camera aperture, a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels and higher 30 fps video frame rate. The Motorola One Hyper counts with a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory.
The Motorola One Hyper has a little better battery life than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3900mAh.
Although Motorola One Hyper is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Motorola DROID Turbo, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.