Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2019-05-15 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Blue and Brown |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Vision has an overall score of 80.7, which is just a bit better than the Motorola DROID Turbo's 77.9 overall score. Motorola One Vision is a extremely newer and noticeably thinner cellphone than the Motorola DROID Turbo, although it's also a bit heavier. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a more vivid display than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a greater screen density.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Vision, because although it has an inferior number of cores and lesser RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics processor. The Motorola One Vision counts with a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Motorola One Vision features a better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola One Vision also has a camera in the back with lot more megapixels, better video frame rate and a larger aperture to take better low light captures and videos.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a little better battery performance than Motorola One Vision, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.