Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2019-09-05 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Zoom is a bit better than the Motorola DROID Turbo, having a overall score of 80 against 77.9. The Motorola One Zoom construction is way newer and incredibly thinner than the Motorola DROID Turbo's, but it's also just a little heavier. Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a much sharper display than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a better pixel density.
Motorola DROID Turbo features a bit better processor than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has 4 lesser CPU cores (but faster) and 1 GB less RAM, it also counts with an additional GPU. The Motorola One Zoom captures better videos and photos than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same video definition, the Motorola One Zoom also has higher 30 frames per second video frame rates, a lot more MP back facing camera and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and videos in low light environments.
The Motorola One Zoom counts with a lot bigger memory to install games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal memory and an external SD slot that holds up to 128 GB. The Motorola One Zoom features just a little better battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3900mAh.
Although Motorola One Zoom is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo. If you want to save some money, you can buy Motorola DROID Turbo, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.