Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 135.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is better than Motorola DROID Turbo, with an 87 score against 77.9. Both devices in this review include Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola razr (2020) has the previous 11 version and Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4. The Motorola razr (2020) is a noticeably newer and extremely thinner phone than the Motorola DROID Turbo, although it is also just a little bit heavier.
Motorola DROID Turbo has a lot better screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot greater display pixels density and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440. Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a little bit better performance than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has 5 GB lesser RAM memory and less processing cores , it also counts with a GPU.
Motorola razr (2020) has a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola razr (2020) shoots much clearer photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a larger aperture, higher 30 frames per second video frame rate and a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a superior battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola DROID Turbo. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Motorola razr (2020), else you can save some money and buy the Motorola DROID Turbo, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.