Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2019-03-03 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a global score of 77.9, which is just a bit better than the Nokia 9 PureView's 76.4 overall score. The Motorola DROID Turbo is a noticeably older, much thicker and just a little bit heavier phone than the Nokia 9 PureView. The Motorola DROID Turbo features a much better display than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per screen inch.
The Nokia 9 PureView has a little faster CPU than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with a greater number of faster cores and a higher amount of RAM. The Nokia 9 PureView has a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Motorola DROID Turbo captures slightly better videos and photos than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has worse video frame rates and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video quality, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution. Motorola DROID Turbo features improved battery lifetime than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has a 3900mAh battery capacity instead of 3320mAh.
Motorola DROID Turbo is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.