Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2021-07-29 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Nokia XR20 is just a bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo, having a global score of 80.8 against 77.9. Nokia XR20 is a notably newer and a little thinner phone than the Motorola DROID Turbo, although it's notably heavier. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS, but the Nokia XR20 has an older 11 version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version.
Motorola DROID Turbo features a bit better processing unit than Nokia XR20, because although it has a lower number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. The Motorola DROID Turbo has a more vivid screen than Nokia XR20, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a better pixel number per inch of display.
Nokia XR20 captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Nokia XR20 also has better 60 fps video frame rates, a larger aperture to take better low-light photos and video and a much better resolution back facing camera.
The Nokia XR20 features a much bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB more internal storage. The Nokia XR20 features improved battery life than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 4630mAh of battery capacity instead of 3900mAh.
Although Nokia XR20 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Nokia XR20, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Motorola DROID Turbo, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.