Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-10-28 | 2019-10-16 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Cyber shade |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a global score of 77.9, which is a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's overall score of 75.8. Both phones in this review work with Android operating system, but the Motorola DROID Turbo has the previous 4.4.4 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version. Despite of the fact the Motorola DROID Turbo is notably older and somewhat thicker than the nubia Red Magic 3S, it's design is still lighter.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a little faster CPU than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM and more cpu cores. Motorola DROID Turbo has a much better looking display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a greater display pixels density and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has more internal storage capacity. Nubia Red Magic 3S has a way better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a lot higher video definition, a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light images and videos and a back camera with a lot better resolution.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with improved battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3900mAh.
Motorola DROID Turbo is not only the best devices in our comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.