Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 10 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-09-02 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Sonic silver |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo has an overall score of 77.9, which is a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 5S's 76.2 global score. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola DROID Turbo has 4.4.4 version while nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10, providing the user some nice extra features. Motorola DROID Turbo's construction is somewhat lighter than the nubia Red Magic 5S, although it's somewhat thicker and was released many years before.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a more vivid display than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution. The nubia Red Magic 5S has a little faster processor than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM and a greater number of faster cores.
Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. Nubia Red Magic 5S takes way better photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a way better video quality, a camera in the back with way more megapixels and a bigger aperture to take better photos in low-light environments.
Nubia Red Magic 5S has just a little bit longer battery life than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3900mAh.
The Motorola DROID Turbo is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.