Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 14 |
| 2014-10-28 | -- |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 135.00 | $ 230.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo has a global score of 77.9, which is slightly better than Galaxy A16 5G's 76.2 global score. Motorola DROID Turbo's construction is way thicker but somewhat lighter than the Galaxy A16 5G. Both devices we are comparing here work with Android OS, but Motorola DROID Turbo has a more recent 4.4.4 version while Galaxy A16 5G has Android 14, providing you a lot of extra features.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a greater display pixels density. The Galaxy A16 5G has a much better memory for applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal memory capacity.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a lot better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has lesser CPU cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit. Motorola DROID Turbo features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light images and a much worse resolution camera.
The Galaxy A16 5G counts with superior battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, Motorola DROID Turbo is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.