Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-10-28 | 2019-10-05 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Blue, Green and Red |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 565 pixels per inch | 264 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.54 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A20s, having a overall score of 77.9 against 77. Both phones we are comparing here come with Android operating system, but the Motorola DROID Turbo has a newer 4.4.4 version while Samsung Galaxy A20s has Android 11 version. The Motorola DROID Turbo is a notably older and a lot thicker phone than Samsung Galaxy A20s, but Motorola could make it a little bit lighter anyway.
Motorola DROID Turbo has a little bit better performance than Galaxy A20s, because although it has lesser RAM memory and 4 lesser processing cores , it also counts with an extra GPU. Motorola DROID Turbo features a way better looking screen than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher display density and a way better resolution of 2560 x 1440.
The Motorola DROID Turbo shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for shooting pictures and/or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a way better video quality and a back camera with way more MP. The Samsung Galaxy A20s features a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A20s also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy A20s counts with just a bit better battery duration than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.