Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 14 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2023-12-11 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A25 5G has a general score of 79.9, which is a little bit better than the Motorola DROID Turbo's overall score of 77.9. These devices work with Android OS, but Galaxy A25 5G has the previous 14 version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version. Although the Galaxy A25 5G is heavier than Motorola DROID Turbo, it's thinner and a lot newer.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a very superior hardware performance than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics processor. Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a better screen pixel density and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution.
Galaxy A25 5G takes much better pictures and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A25 5G also has better 30 frames per second video frame rates, a larger aperture to take better photos and videos in low light situations and a camera in the back with a way higher 50 mega pixels resolution.
Galaxy A25 5G counts with much more storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1 TB. Galaxy A25 5G has greater battery duration than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.