Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 10 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-04-27 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A31 has an overall score of 81.3, which is just a bit better than the Motorola DROID Turbo's overall score of 77.9. Both phones in this review work with Android OS, but Galaxy A31 has older 10 version and Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version. The Galaxy A31 design is a lot newer and way thinner, but a little bit heavier than Motorola DROID Turbo.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a bit better processing power than Galaxy A31, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and less cpu cores (although faster), it also counts with a graphics processing unit. Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a better display than Galaxy A31, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and more pixels per inch of display.
The Galaxy A31 shoots slightly better videos and photos than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Galaxy A31 also has better 30 fps video frame rate and a way more MP back-facing camera. Samsung Galaxy A31 counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A31 also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy A31 features superior battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.