Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 13 |
| 2014-10-28 | -- |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | -- |
| 6.21 ounces | -- |
| Black and Blue | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A34 is just a bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo, having an 82.9 score against 77.9. The Samsung Galaxy A34 body is thinner and way lighter than Motorola DROID Turbo. These phones come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A34 has 13 version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a bit better performance than Galaxy A34, because although it has lesser RAM and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. Motorola DROID Turbo features a better looking screen than Galaxy A34, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a greater count of pixels per display inch.
The Galaxy A34's camera is very similar to Motorola DROID Turbo's camera, although the Galaxy A34 also has a way higher resolution camera in the back and a larger aperture. The Galaxy A34's memory capacity for apps and games is just as good as Motorola DROID Turbo's one, both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A34 features better battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.