Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A41 has a general score of 81.7, which is just a bit better than the Motorola DROID Turbo's 77.9 global score. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A41 has the previous 11 version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version. Galaxy A41 is a incredibly newer device, and it's also somewhat lighter and extremely thinner than Motorola DROID Turbo.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a much better looking display than Galaxy A41, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a higher display pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy A41 features a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A41 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A41, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. The Galaxy A41 features a much better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and a F2 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A41 also has a way more MP camera and higher 30 frames per second video frame rates.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a bit longer battery life than Galaxy A41, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.