Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2017-01-13 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo has a global score of 77.9, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017)'s global score of 75.8. Motorola DROID Turbo is an extremely older, notably thicker and just a little bit heavier cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017). The Motorola DROID Turbo has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have a display of the same size, the Motorola DROID Turbo also has a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a greater pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) has more memory to store more games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 256 GB. The Motorola DROID Turbo has a bit better processing power than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have 3 GB of RAM memory, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a GPU.
The Motorola DROID Turbo shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for taking pictures and video in low-light situations, it also counts with a lot more megapixels camera in the back and a lot higher (4K) video definition.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 3900mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.