Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-10-28 | 2019-10-20 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50s has an overall score of 86.6, which is better than the Motorola DROID Turbo's 77.9 overall score. These phones have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A50s has the previous 10 version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4. The Samsung Galaxy A50s design is much newer, a little bit lighter and way thinner than Motorola DROID Turbo.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. The Motorola DROID Turbo features a more vivid display than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and more pixels per display inch.
Galaxy A50s features a superior camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same video quality and a F2 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A50s also has a camera with a much better resolution and faster 30 frames per second video frame rate. Galaxy A50s counts with a much bigger memory to store more apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy A50s counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.