Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2019-12-27 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 has an overall score of 85.5, which is a little bit better than the Motorola DROID Turbo's 77.9 general score. Galaxy A51's construction is newer, much thinner and just a little lighter than Motorola DROID Turbo. These phones work with Android OS, but the Galaxy A51 has 11 version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and lesser CPU cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a graphics co-processor. Motorola DROID Turbo has a much better looking screen than Galaxy A51, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a better number of pixels per screen inch and a higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution.
Galaxy A51 has a superior storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A51 takes better photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has better 30 frames per second video frame rate and a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A51 features just a little better battery life than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Although Galaxy A51 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola DROID Turbo. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Galaxy A51, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola DROID Turbo, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.