Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-04-29 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Prism cube black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a general score of 90.8, which is better than the Motorola DROID Turbo's overall score of 77.9. These phones use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has the older 11 version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is just a little bit heavier than the Motorola DROID Turbo, it's a lot thinner and also notably newer.
Motorola DROID Turbo features a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has 4 lesser processing cores (although faster) and 3 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with an additional GPU. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a greater pixel density.
The Galaxy A51 5G features a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A51 5G features a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3900mAh.
The Galaxy A51 5G captures much better videos and photos than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a same size aperture, the Galaxy A51 5G also has higher 30 fps video frame rates and a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels.
Although Galaxy A51 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the Motorola DROID Turbo, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.