Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and Blue | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is better than the Motorola DROID Turbo, having a general score of 91.3 against 77.9. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G construction is way newer and noticeably thinner, but also just a bit heavier than the Motorola DROID Turbo. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has the previous 12 version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and 4 less CPU cores , it also counts with a graphics processing unit. Motorola DROID Turbo has a much better looking display than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and more pixels per inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G shoots much better pictures and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a back camera with a lot higher 64 mega-pixels resolution, better 30 fps video frame rate and a bigger aperture to take better low light captures.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy A52 5G has a bit better battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.