Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2021-09-01 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52s is much better than the Motorola DROID Turbo, having a 91.1 score against 77.9. Samsung Galaxy A52s's design is notably newer and extremely thinner than the Motorola DROID Turbo's, although it is just a little bit heavier. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A52s has the previous 11 version and Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a better looking display than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a better count of pixels per inch in the screen. The Motorola DROID Turbo features a little bit better performance than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a lower number of cores (although faster) and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit.
Galaxy A52s has a way bigger storage to install games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory. The Galaxy A52s has a way better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A52s also has higher 30 fps video frame rates, a way more MP back-facing camera and a larger aperture for better photos and videos in poorly lited environments.
Galaxy A52s counts with a little longer battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 15 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.