Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2018-05-22 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.54 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo has an overall score of 77.9, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A6's 75.8 general score. Motorola DROID Turbo is a better phone than the Galaxy A6, we must highlight that it's also a notably older, incredibly thicker and just a bit heavier phone. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a much better display than Galaxy A6, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a way better display pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy A6 has a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 400 GB. The Motorola DROID Turbo has a little faster processing unit than Galaxy A6, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with an additional GPU.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with greater battery performance than Galaxy A6, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. Motorola DROID Turbo has just a bit better camera than Galaxy A6, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way higher 20.7 mega pixels resolution back camera and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Although Motorola DROID Turbo is a better device, it is more expensive than the Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A6. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Motorola DROID Turbo, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Galaxy A6, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.