Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2017-01-13 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo has an overall score of 77.9, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A7 (2017)'s global score of 75.8. The Motorola DROID Turbo is a way older and notably thicker phone than Galaxy A7 (2017), but Motorola was able to build it a little lighter anyway. Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a much sharper display than Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution.
Motorola DROID Turbo has a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has less cpu cores (although faster), and they both have 3 GB of RAM memory, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with an extra GPU. Galaxy A7 (2017) features a greater memory for applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 256 GB.
Motorola DROID Turbo features a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has an 8% more battery capacity. The Motorola DROID Turbo captures slightly better photos and videos than Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low-light photos and videos, it also counts with a way better 20.7 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a way better 3840x2160 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.