Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-10-28 | 2019-04-26 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A70, with a score of 77.9 against 76.9. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola DROID Turbo has newer 4.4.4 version and Samsung Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version, so it gives you a lot of extra features. The Motorola DROID Turbo body is just a little bit lighter than Samsung Galaxy A70, but it is a lot thicker and was released many years before.
Motorola DROID Turbo features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy A70, because although it has less RAM and an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a graphics co-processor. Motorola DROID Turbo features a way better screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a better number of pixels per inch in the display and a higher 2560 x 1440px resolution.
Motorola DROID Turbo shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy A70, although it has worse video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking photographs and/or video in low-light environments, they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition. The Galaxy A70 features a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy A70 features just a bit longer battery life than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Motorola DROID Turbo is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.