Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 is better than the Motorola DROID Turbo, getting an 87.5 score against 77.9. The Galaxy A71 body is noticeably newer and way thinner, but also just a little heavier than Motorola DROID Turbo. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A71 has 11 version and Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A71, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a higher pixel density. Samsung Galaxy A71 features a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has more internal storage and a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Motorola DROID Turbo features just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A71, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. Galaxy A71 counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 15% greater battery size.
Samsung Galaxy A71 takes much clearer pictures and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also has a larger aperture, better video frame rate and a lot higher resolution back camera.
Although Galaxy A71 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola DROID Turbo. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Galaxy A71, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Motorola DROID Turbo, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.