Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-10-16 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F41 is a bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo, getting a general score of 85.2 against 77.9. The Galaxy F41 design is extremely newer and incredibly thinner, but also a little bit heavier than the Motorola DROID Turbo. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy F41 has older 11 version and Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy F41, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher count of pixels per inch of display and a better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution. Galaxy F41 features much more storage for games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy F41 also has a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy F41, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and 4 lesser cores , it also counts with an extra GPU. Samsung Galaxy F41 has a way better battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity against 3900mAh.
Galaxy F41 takes way better pictures and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy F41 also has a bigger aperture for better low light captures and video, faster 30 fps video frame rate and a camera with a much better 64 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.